Christopher Altman

Christopher Altman

Frontier AI Evaluation · Alignment · Quantum Machine Learning
Space Telemetry Anomaly Detection · Superconducting Qubits

Founder, Continuation Observatory · Structural AI Evaluation · Quantum Information

Reproducible evaluation harnesses for frontier AI and quantum systems

Building reproducible instruments for frontier AI evaluation, alignment testing, and quantum-system benchmarks.


Our research program develops reproducible evaluation harnesses for testing claims in frontier AI, quantum machine learning, and superconducting quantum systems. We combine quantum machine learning methods with classical testbeds to probe function–representation decoupling, continuation interests, and the reliability of geometric proxies in model repair.

Current work spans structural AI evaluation, continuation-risk measurement, quantum kernel methods for telemetry anomaly detection, binarized quantum neural networks, Hamiltonian dynamics for data augmentation, recursive self-improvement, satellite quantum key distribution, superconducting-qubit simulation, and hardware benchmarks for Wigner’s-friend-style circuits. Each project is packaged as a reproducible evaluation harness with diagnostic plots, baselines, and reviewable artifacts designed to test specific technical claims under controlled experimental conditions.

Accuracy vs Identifiability

This live codebase reflects active research collaborations and coauthored work across AI alignment, quantum machine learning, and superconducting circuits. Repositories are maintained as reproducible artifacts; credit for specific contributions appears in papers, commit history, and project documentation.

Coauthorship

Research claims are anchored in publishable units: falsifiable hypotheses, experimental protocols, and measurable outcomes.

  • Paper-grade methods sections and result traces
  • Clear provenance: what changed, why, and what it implies
  • Attribution in manuscripts and repo history

Joint Codebases

Projects are structured so collaborators can reproduce, extend, or refute results with minimal friction.

  • Deterministic runs (seeds, artifacts, locked protocols)
  • Comparable baselines and diagnostic plots
  • Small, reviewable increments over time

Ongoing Threads

The emphasis is disciplined iteration: refine the claim, tighten the test, and keep the artifact honest.

  • Alignment falsification testbeds
  • Quantum kernels + telemetry/anomaly regimes
  • Device-oriented superconducting qubit studies

Collaboration inquiries: x@christopheraltman.com

Selected Publications

+6.2%
BQNN parity advantage vs classical
ρ ≈ 0.04
Accuracy decouples from recoverability
Δ = 0.381
Continuation-interest separation
Cmag ≈ 1.1673
Phase coherence (IBM Quantum)

Each repository is treated as a reviewable scientific artifact: a bounded claim, a reproducible protocol, diagnostic plots, baseline comparisons, and notes on where the method fails or remains unvalidated.

Research Themes